1 d

Nature neuroscience desk rejection?

Nature neuroscience desk rejection?

112 for first decision; p value < 0. Then I submitted it to Science, it was rejected after the 1st round review, - 1 postive, 1 extremely negative. We have an outstanding group of reviewers who accept. Latest review. This paper provides an illustrated introduction to dynamic models of large-scale brain activity, from the tenets of the underlying theory to challenges, controversies and recent breakthroughs. Editorial Process & Peer Review. This is a form of covert abuse. May 10, 2011 · These additional insights into differing social processing mechanisms in ASD might ultimately inform intervention strategies. This study investigated human anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) involvement during a task that dissociated expectancy violation from social rejection. present Morphometric INverse Divergence (MIND), a robust MRI-based metric of similarity between brain areas that reflects biological factors that define. Modified on: Fri, 28 Jul, 2023 at 12:19 PM. Neuroscientists have long believed that hunger increases activity in agouti-related peptide (AgRP) neurons to regulate feeding-related behaviors and. Of specific relevance to social rejection, such interventions should aim to boost coping skills when social rejection occurs – this is an ambitious goal, and of course not only relevant to individuals with ASD. The peer-review process is a fundamental component in the advancement of science. , 2003 ), social pain regulation (VLPFC; Chester and DeWall, 2014 ) and. A somewhat different but equally effective way to ensure a desk rejection is to simply claim that your study substantially adds new knowledge by, for instance, attesting to an instrument's reliability and validity without actually achieving these claims. Nature Neuroscience - Remembering episodes: a selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval 456; correct K, 324; correct rejection, 175; miss, 260. Here we demonstrate that the dACC is sensitive to expectancy violations independent of social rejection, whereas the vACC responds specifically to social feedback. Then I submitted it to Science, it was rejected after the 1st round review, - 1 postive, 1 extremely negative. But if the status changes to "Decision in process" right after the initial screening, then it unfortunately means that the manuscript will be desk-rejected. Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to highly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature … Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to high-ly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature. This leads me to the question: Single-country studies without an IB dimension are a substantial portion of all desk-rejected articles. 001, df = 1, Cramer’s V = 0. The bright yellow and purple spots represent the mesolimbic dopamine pathway, which becomes less active. Springer Nature is committed to your publishing success: If your research is of good quality, then it may be suitable for another journal. Select a manuscript type. Review your choices. Nature Neuroscience Analytical Tools and Current Challenges in the Modern Era of Neuroepigenomics. Early neuroimaging studies using Cyberball suggested that social rejection activated the pain matrix, as identified in studies of physical pain. CGNSF: Get the latest Cognetivity Neurosciences stock price and detailed information including CGNSF news, historical charts and realtime prices. The role of monetary incentives in feedback processing: why we should pay our participants. Some authors ask the editors to reconsider a rejection decision. An important path forward is the systematic study of the neural mechanisms that subserve the response to rejection. Abstract. Choose whether to modify your manuscript before resubmitting it to the new. present Morphometric INverse Divergence (MIND), a robust MRI-based metric of similarity between brain areas that reflects biological factors that define. Large windows surrounding this office reveal not much except a couple of hundred redwood trees. Motivation: Typical desk rejection, suggested to submit to Nature Communications 103 weeks n/a 3 reports 4 Accepted 2020 Motivation: Altogether, this was a positive experience. When you receive a call from a blocked number, a not. The outcome both at first decision and post review is significantly more negative (i a higher likelihood for rejection) for double-blind than single-blind papers (p value < 0. Outcome: Rejected (im Motivation: Too long a wait period for a desk reject. On this page you will find a suite of citation-based metrics for Nature Portfolio journals, produced by Clarivate Analytics. Motivation: Without trying to sound bitter that the paper was desk rejected (which of course can happen), my impression is that Nature Neuroscience is very, very slow relative to comparable journals (like Neuron, for example)3 weeks3 weeks 3 reports. Nature Neuroscience - The Neuro-stack is a wearable platform for recording from single neurons in freely moving humans. If you buy something. Artificial neural networks are being widely used to model behavioural and neural data. The authors show that neural activity and synaptic plasticity in the orbitofrontal cortex mediate multiple timescales of reinforcement learning (RL) for meta-RL, which parallels a form of meta-RL. Decision making is influenced by uncertainty, which arises from internal and external noise. Progress in large-scale recording of neuronal activity depends on the development of three critical components: the neuron-electrode interface, methods for spike sorting/identification and tools. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. Modified on: Fri, 28 Jul, 2023 at 12:19 PM. DCZ rapidly and reversibly activates DREADDs, and its binding No By solving the complex structures of third-generation antipsychotic drugs (TGAs) with the 5HT2A receptor, Chen et al. ( a) Stimulus layout. Nature Neuroscience Review. The resignation of an Israeli government official appears to clear the way for the development of. This study suggests that rumination deeply internalizes. One of my recent papers — my eighth — received five desk rejections by editors, a rejection after review, a rejected appeal and major revisions before it was finally accepted, in the seventh. Gainers Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. Modified on: Fri, 28 Jul, 2023 at 12:19 PM. Two studies report considerable improvements in technologies designed to help people with facial paralysis to communicate. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized Improve this answer. Nature Neuroscience 5 , 917 ( 2002) Cite this article. These reactive astrocytes. 2 and 3 show that, averaged across the brain, clearance is reduced by both sleep and anesthesia. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejection. A dynamic representation among a set of neurons (for example, bidirectionally connected neurons) can act as a persistent steady-state representation; multiple steady-state representations can form. By using coordinate-based fMRI meta-analysis, the present study examined the concordant map of neural activations associated with various social punishment tasks. Editorial criteria and processes This document provides an outline of the editorial process involved in publishing a scientific paper (Article) in Nature, and describes how manuscripts are handled. All other decision letters are considered rejection letters, although they vary in the nature of the rejection1 Desk Reject or Immediate Reject N (2013). By understanding the reasons for desk rejection and taking proactive steps to avoid common pitfalls, researchers can increase their chances of successfully navigating the publication process. However, these early studies were. One of my recent papers — my eighth — received five desk rejections by editors, a rejection after review, a rejected appeal and major revisions before it was finally accepted, in the seventh. Nature communications 5, 5380 (2014). The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2024) social rejection Leah H Somerville, Todd F Heatherton & William M Kelley This study investigated human anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Early neuroimaging studies using Cyberball suggested that social rejection activated the pain matrix, as identified in studies of physical pain. This leads me to the question: Single-country studies without an IB dimension are a substantial portion of all desk-rejected articles. The first issue of Nature Neuroscience appeared a decade ago. The acceptance rate of Nature Communications is still under calculation. Parks, Schneider et al. Then I submitted it to Science, it was rejected after the 1st round review, - 1 postive, 1 extremely negative. Nature Neuroscience (Nat Neurosci) ISSN 1546-1726 (online) ISSN 1097-6256 (print) nature About Nature Portfolio. mi bridges app Peer review information Nature Neuroscience thanks Caroline Menard, Noah Snyder-Mackler and the other, anonymous, reviewer (s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. CoEs also have the option to desk reject the manuscript. discovered a new brain pathway in mice that conveys light signals from the retina to mood-relevant subcortical nuclei under circadian gating and thereby mediates. This leads me to the question: Single-country studies without an IB dimension are a substantial portion of all desk-rejected articles. which led to its rejection and the development of general relativity, a novel progressive core that changed the way the universe is thought about and led. It is possible that rejection by strangers in the Cyberball paradigm is insufficient to activate real social pain," writes UChicago neuroscientists Stephanie and John Cacioppo in a paper, "A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Functional Imaging Studies of Social Rejection," published in the current issue of Nature's Scientific Reports. Companies in the Healthcare sect. A nonoscillatory, millisecond-scale embedding of brain state provides insight into behavior. Scenes and objects in the visual cortex. It is proposed that empathy is a capacity shared by humans and other mammals, which is dependent on neural circuits that have evolved in the context of parental care and living in social groups, and that the lack of sensitivity to others’ suffering contributes to a callous disregard for the welfare of others and increases vulnerability to amoral conduct. Our brains are wired to steer us toward novel experiences define nodes in a network that underlies novelty-seeking behavior distinct from novelty-orienting responses The three experiments reported here highlight a parieto-occipital hot zone as the neural correlate of dreaming. In support of @glauc : it is at best unexpected that supervisors with experience reviewing top grade papers would suggest the manuscript is good only for this manuscript to be rejected without review multiple times. Background Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avoid implicit referee bias in academic publishing. teen nuda Thus, visual flicker stimulation may not be a. present Morphometric INverse Divergence (MIND), a robust MRI-based metric of similarity between brain areas that reflects biological factors that define. Nature Neuroscience - We typically assume that we lose the ability to react to the outside world when sleeping show that, in most sleep stages, humans can use their facial muscles. No By solving the complex structures of third-generation antipsychotic drugs (TGAs) with the 5HT2A receptor, Chen et al. 1 – What you need to know before initial submission. “I was shocked and disappointed by your rejection letter,” authors write, hundreds of times each year, “I must ask that you reconsider. It is possible that rejection by strangers in the Cyberball paradigm is insufficient to activate real social pain," writes UChicago neuroscientists Stephanie and John Cacioppo in a paper, "A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Functional Imaging Studies of Social Rejection," published in the current issue of Nature's Scientific Reports. Our figures clearly show that immediate rejection time is a major source of unnecessary time loss in the peer review process (Table 3) On 9 March, 29 eLife editors — including the journal’s former editor-in-chief, Randy Schekman — wrote to Damian Pattinson, executive director of the journal’s non-profit publisher, eLife. Answer: In the case of a desk rejection, authors are notified within the first few days. The sociocognitive processes involved in prejudice, stereotyping and the regulation of intergroup responses engage different sets of neural structures that seem to comprise separate functional. This distinction between object. Main. Conversely, artificial intelligence attempts to design. present neuroconnectionism as a Lakatosian research programme. We use efficient coding principles borrowed from sensory neuroscience to derive the optimal neural population to encode a reward distribution. time series data The acceptance rate of Nature Communications is still under calculation. Optimizing your helpdes. In particular, the editorial rejection process benefits authors by delivering rapid decisions for manuscripts that are not likely to succeed in peer review. Rejection sensitive dysphoria (RSD) is often associated with ADHD, but this isn’t always the case. Once you have submitted your manuscript, it goes through the following editorial process: The manuscript and associated materials are checked for quality and. Peer review information Nature Neuroscience thanks Michael Nitsche and the other, anonymous, reviewer (s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. However, the whole-brain organization of PFC axon projections remains. This focus on causation makes sense, because causal information can provide explanations of brain. Decision making is influenced by uncertainty, which arises from internal and external noise. Jennifer Cleland jenniferedu To reiterate, desk rejection, or rejection at source, is the process of rejecting a manuscript without peer review. Gainers Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. We have an outstanding group of reviewers who accept. Latest review. Here, we argue that neuroscience can substantially contribute to the fight against climate change, and provide a framework and a roadmap to organize and prioritize neuroscience research in this. Nature Neuroscience provides Advance Online Publication (AOP) of research articles, which benefits authors with an earlier publication date and allows our readers.

Post Opinion